Summary: Carney could stay longer at the BoE
Time for a recap:
Mark Carney has taken a big step towards staying on as Bank of England governor to help Britain through the choppy waters after Brexit.
After days of speculation, Carney revealed that he had offered to do whatever he could to ensure Britain’s exit from the EU was smooth.
That’s a big hint that he could stay in post beyond June 2019 - potentially for another year, or even until the end of a Brexit transition period.
He told the Treasury committee that:
I am willing to do whatever else I can in order to promote both a smooth Brexit and effective transition at the Bank of England.
The chancellor and I have discussed this. I would expect an announcement to be made in due course.”
However, we don’t know exactly what Carney is proposing....
Carney also flagged up that it could be easier to appoint a successor once there is more clarity about Brexit, and insisted there’s no shortage of good candidates for one of the biggest jobs in central banking.
The Treasury has declined to respond, saying Mark Carney’s “speak for themselves”, but promised that an announcement is coming. Commitee chair Nicky Morgan is pushing for a quick decision.
Carney also tried to placate Brexit-supporters, indicating that the prospect of Boris Johnson or even Jacob Rees-Mogg becoming PM wouldn’t shake his enthusiasm for the job.
Some City investors have welcomed the news, saying it would provide much-needed stability.
During the hearing at parliament, the Bank of England also warned MPs that a no-deal Brexit would drive up prices in the shops and send the pound tumbling (just the sort of comments that have upset Leave supporters in the past).
As Carney put it:
“It’s likely that the real income squeeze will return for households across the country.”
“You can’t avoid that medium-term impact on real incomes.”
There was little reaction in the markets to Carney’s offer, with the pound dipping against the US dollar today.
In other news...
- Amazon has followed Apple to become America’s second $1trn company (although shares have dropped back from their earlier peak).
- TSB CEO Paul Pester has (finally) paid the price for the bank’s IT meltdown.
- Growth in Britain’s construction sector has hit a three-month low
- South Africa has lurched into recession, sending its currency sliding again.
That’s all for today. Thanks for reading and commenting. GW
Another central banker, Alan Greenspan, once remarked that “If I seem unduly clear to you, you must have misunderstood what I said.”
Mark Carney has hacked back to that particular Greenspan doctrine at times over the last five years.
And even today, as Channel 4’s business editor, Siobhan Kennedy, points out, we still don’t know exactly what’s happening over the governorship....
Back in the financial markets, Amazon just hit a $1trn market capitalisation.
Amazon’s share price rose over the ‘magic’ figure of $2050.27, making it the second US company - after Apple - to be worth $1,000,000,000,000.
Amazon’s value has surged in the last year, as the company has continued to post strong sales growth and cement its strong position in web services and the cloud.
It’s super news for anyone who bought shares 20 years ago, or indeed last autumn!
May's spokeswoman: Carney has done well
The Treasury committee hearing has wrapped up.
And across the road in Westminster, Theresa May’s spokeswoman has confirmed that an announcement on Mark Carney’s future is being worked on.
Reuters has the details:
British Prime Minister Theresa May thinks Mark Carney has done a good job as governor of the Bank of England, her spokeswoman said on Tuesday, adding that there would be further announcements on the matter.
“The prime minister obviously thinks he has done a good job in his time as governor, and there will be more to say on that in due course,” the spokeswoman told reporters.
Carney said earlier he was ready to extend his time in charge of the central bank to help Britain’s economy as it leaves the EU.
Nicky Morgan MP, Chair of the Treasury Committee, has urged the Treasury to make a decision about Mark Carney’s future soon - and press on with finding his successor too.
She says:
“In his evidence session with the Treasury Committee today, Mark Carney indicated that he is willing to stay as Governor of the Bank of England beyond June 2019 if it would assist the Government.
“Stability is vital during this important period. The sooner the Government provides clarity, the better. Any extension to Dr Carney’s term should not be used to delay succession planning.”
John Mann MP then asks BoE chief economist Andy Haldane how he’d deliver on Labour’s policy to make the Bank boost UK productivity.
Under this plan, the BoE would be set a new 3% productivity growth target (alongside its 2% inflation goal)
How, Mann asks, would this be achieved? What tools would be deployed?
Haldane scratches his ear, and explains that while such targets are a good idea, the key question is who is best placed to deliver them.
The Bank’s existing mandate for price stability and financial stability should help productivity growth, but they won’t deliver it on their own, he says.
In the long run, though, productivity growth depends on having a skilled and educated workforce, and infrastructure improvements.
And, Haldane concludes, central banks do not build roads or railways, hospitals or schools. They don’t train apprentices, and they don’t teach schoolchildren.
Governor Carney adds that the Bank would have greater responsibility for productivity, but not more powers to solve the problems.
We wouldn’t have the tools, Mr Mann, to achieve it.
The FT’s Chris Giles suggests this might put the bank in a sticky situation:
John Mann MP asks Carney if he’d still want to be Bank of England governor if Boris Johnson or Jacob Rees-Mogg were prime minister in June 2019.
Carney suggests that this wouldn’t put him off.
These jobs are technocratic jobs. You serve the remit set by parliament and the government of the day.
A former Bank of England policymaker, Andrew Sentance, has criticised the whole circus around Mark Carney’s future.
Today’s session follows days of speculation about whether the Treasury and the Bank were trying to hammer out an agreement to keep the governor for longer.
That, Sentance told Radio 4’s World at One, bad for the central bank’s credibility:
“It seems like the appointment of the governor is something that is happening between the Chancellor and the governor, and is not happening in a transparent way.
“It seems an awful lot is happening in this appointment process behind the scenes and that is not good in terms of the independence of the Bank of England.”
Treasury committee member Wes Streeting has welcomed Mark Carney’s offer to stay on longer, and hopes an announcement comes soon.
Ed Conway of Sky News suspects that Carney could actually extend his governorship to 2021, rather than leaving in June 2019 as currently planned.
That would mean a full eight-year stint (he started in summer 2013) - the standard term for BoE governors.
Carney: A Brexit deal would boost the pound.
Q: How vulnerable is sterling to a sudden devaluation?
Mark Carney takes a ‘glass half-full’ approach. He thinks the pound is currently suffering from the risk of a no-deal Brexit, so it might rise if an agreement and a transition deal is reached.
But if that doesn’t happen, the pound would move the other way, he explains.
City investor: Keeping Carney longer would make sense
Quilter Investors head of investment, Anthony Gillham, believes the UK government should accept Mark Carney’s offer to stay longer at the Bank of England.
Gillham concedes that Carney hasn’t be “universally popular” (particularly with Leave supporters, who have hated his warnings about Brexit).
But even so, Britain would benefit from an experienced hand at the top of the Bank in the likely turbulent times ahead.
Gillham writes:
“Central banks have done a lot of heavy lifting over the last decade in an effort to restore economic stability, although they have often been required to swim upstream against a current of destabilising political uncertainty. As if to illustrate the point, despite the Bank of England’s efforts to protect sterling over the summer, we have seen the pound chasing up positive sentiment around Brexit, before following it back down when the political rhetoric changes.
“If Mark Carney’s tenure is extended he will have his work cut out, but the case for an experienced captain to guide the UK through dangerous waters has grown stronger as Brexit negotiations have dragged on. He will install a measure of certainty on monetary policy, which provides some air cover through what will surely be an unpredictable spell. As Bank of England governor Mark Carney hasn’t always been universally popular, but appointing him as temporary caretaker through this period of transition does make sense.”
The Treasury have declined to comment on Mark Carney’s comments today, but have confirmed that an announcement will come in due course.
The committee have moved away from Mark Carney’s future, and onto the impact of artificial intelligence on the UK economy (are they suggesting the governor could be replaced by a robot?).
Q: How many jobs will be lost to the fourth industrial revolution?
Chief economist Andy Haldane says estimates for gross job losses range from 10% and 50% of the global workforce - as jobs are automated or entire professions are replaced with software.
Of course, you also need to factor in how many new jobs are created (coding all those robots etc)
But the big picture is that the gross job losses due to AI, big data, etc, the gross job losses will be “at least as large and possibly larger as in previous industrial revolutions”, Haldane adds.
Full story: Carney could stay longer at the Bank
Here’s our news story on governor Carney’s pledge to help Britain through Brexit by serving longer at the Bank of England:
Mark Carney has confirmed he is in talks with the Treasury over staying on at the Bank of England to smooth any potential fallout from Brexit.
Dropping the broadest possible hint he could remain at Threadneedle Street beyond his scheduled departure date in June, the Bank of England governor said: “Even though I have already agreed to extend my time to support a smooth Brexit, I am willing to do whatever else I can in order to promote both a smooth Brexit and an effective transition at the Bank of England.”
Carney confirmed he had held talks with the chancellor, Philip Hammond, over his future, and said an announcement would be made by the government “in due course”.
Speaking to MPs on the Treasury committee, tasked with scrutinising appointments at the central bank, he said: “I am signalling a willingness to do whatever I can to support this process.”...
More here:
Charlie Elphicke MP disputes the Bank’s claim that food prices would surge if Britain left the EU without a deal next year.
Q: Couldn’t the UK set its own tariffs, meaning cheaper food imports from countries outside the EU?
Carney says that any such cut in tariffs would be countered by a slump in sterling after a no-deal Brexit (driving up imports).
There’s not much reaction in the financial markets to Mark Carney’s offer to serve longer at the Bank of England.
The pound is still down 0.25% against the US dollar today, at $1.284.
I guess that’s because a) there’s no actual announcement yet, b) the City’s concerns about Brexit extend well beyond the identity of the Bank of England governor, and c) most currencies have slipped against the US dollar today.
Mary Carney weighs in too -- he says that it is unlikely that Britain would leave the EU without a deal or a transition deal in March.
But if that unlikely scenario does happen, the Bank would do what it could to mitigate the impact on UK real incomes, the governor says.
However, there are ‘limits’ to how much the Bank could tolerate a slump in the pound (in other words, it might be forced to raise interest rates to support sterling).
Bank warns of price rises after 'no deal' Brexit
The Treasury committee are now quizzing the Bank about the impact of a no-deal Brexit on the UK economy.
What might happen to food prices and the cost of living if we reach March 2019 without a deal between the UK and the EU, and both sides walk away?
Chief economist Andy Haldane says it would be a “material rise in the cost of things in the shops”, particularly items that are imported from overseas.
That would be due to a weaker pound and higher tariffs on those goods, he explains.
Q: How long would that effect last for?
History shows that it often persists for several years, Haldane replies.
Carney is asked about his warning last month that a no-deal Brexit is an “uncomfortably high” risk.
Q: Does that mean that it’s now a 60:40 chance? [as trade secretary Liam Fox claimed].
Carney replies that this isn’t what he meant. Brexit negotiations are approaching a critical time, and thus the bank’s Financial Policy Committee is very focused on the risks.
Mark Carney is also asked about the resignation of TSB chief executive Paul Pester this morning, following its IT meltdown.
He replies that senior managers must “absolutely” take responsibility for failures on their watch - be they conduct, operational or financial.
“Responsibility has now been taken” for a series of quite fundamental failings that have disadvantaged many customers and hurt confidence in TSB, he continues coldly (is he suggesting Pester should have quit earlier?)
We look forward to a new team being put in place, the governor continues briskly.
Updated
Carney: Many qualified candidates could become governor....
Q: Has the governor given any thought to who might (eventually) succeed him?
Mark Carney declines to suggest a shortlist, saying only that there are “many qualified candidates”.
Then, rather interestingly, he says there are “some advantages” to running the recruitment process at a time when both sides have “full knowledge of the exact form of Brexit” which the country has chosen.
In other words: It’s rather hard to recruit a world-class central banker to run the Bank of England when you don’t know whether Britain will crash out of the EU without a deal before they even get their feet under the desk....
Updated
Some snap reaction to Mark Carney’s comments:
Unfortunately, Mark Carney has declined to reveal his decision today - after all, it’s the chancellor’s decision to announce.
I’ve “made them aware of my willingness” to do what I can to help, he adds.
Carney adds that “It is a privilege to work at the Bank of England”.
Updated
Treasury committee member Wes Streeting has welcomed Carney’s comments.
[For anyone just tuning in... Mark Carney is currently due to leave the Bank in nine months time. He was originally due to depart this summer, but in 2016 he agreed to stay on until June 2019. Now a further extension is on the cards...]
Updated
CARNEY: I"M WILLING TO DO MORE TO ACHIEVE SMOOTH BREXIT
Nicky Morgan begins the session by joking that today’s session hasn’t attracted much press attention -- and then reads out a stream of headlines about Mark Carney’s future at the Bank of England.
Can he shed any light on whether he’d stay longer at the Bank?
Governor Carney replies that at this “critical period” it is “important that everyone does everything they can to help with the transition of exiting the European Union”.
That includes parliamentarians, business people and central bankers.
Carney says:
Accordingly, even though I have already agreed to extend my time to support a smooth Brexit, I am willing to do whatever else I can in order to promote both a smooth Brexit and an effective transition at the Bank of England.
That sounds like a heavy hint that he’d stay at the Bank, beyond June 2019 - his current exit date.
Carney adds that he has already discussed this issue with the chancellor, Philip Hammond, and he expects an announcement to be made in due course.
More to follow!
Updated
Parliament’s Treasury committee has begun its hearing with Bank of England governor Mark Carney.
He’s accompanied by chief economist Andy Haldane, and Monetary Policy Committee member Silvana Tenreyro.
On the agenda: Last month’s interest rate rise, the outlook for UK growth and inflation, and the state of the economy.
Brexit, and Carney’s own future, will surely also come up too.....
Joel Hills of ITV News reckons Mark Carney wasn’t considering an an extra shift at the Bank of England two months ago.
But perhaps things have changed, now the Treasury have been (apparently) proposing the governor stays in post until 2020.
Just an hour to wait until MPs on the Treasury committee grill Mark Carney about the possibility of extending his contract beyond June 2019.
Craig Erlam of City trading firm OANDA suggests the governor might refuse to be drawn about the issue today (he’s officially there to discuss August’s inflation report).
Carney’s appearance before the Treasury Select Committee on Tuesday comes with an additional twist, following reports that the Treasury is trying to persuade him to extend his term – which ends in the middle of next year - by another 12 months. Carney has already agreed to one extension in order to oversee the Brexit process and the government is clearly hopeful that he will contemplate one more so as to provide some source of stability in otherwise uncertain times.
He hasn’t been the most popular of Governors, primarily among Brexiteers, who are still angry about his predictions on the economy prior to the referendum in the event of a vote to leave.
You have to wonder why Carney would choose to remain in the hot seat given the hand he’s been given and the constant criticism he’s received. Perhaps this is one reason why efforts are being made to retain him for now, it can’t be one of the most sought after jobs at the minute.
The Press Association have compiled a handy Q&A on the IT crisis at TSB.
Q: Why has TSB come under the spotlight?
A: Problems erupted following a migration of customer data from former owner Lloyds’ IT system to a new one managed by TSB’s current owner Sabadell.
Up to 1.9 million people using TSB’s digital and mobile banking found themselves locked out of their bank accounts. Some customers were unable to access their cash or pay bills - while others reported being able to see other people’s accounts.
The Information Commissioner’s Office, which monitors data and privacy, previously said it was looking into the situation.
MPs on the Treasury Committee heard from the bank in April that 40,000 complaints were received over a 10-day period.
By the end of July, over 135,000 complaints had been logged.
Q:What about people who have incurred charges because of the hitches?
A: TSB has promised that its customers will not be left out of pocket as a result of the glitches. They can raise a complaint with the bank, and if they are still unhappy after giving it a chance to respond they can complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service, which resolves disputes between consumers and firms.
Q: Have other problems emerged?
A: MPs have voiced strong concerns over how the problems were handled and fears were also raised about some people being targeted by fraudsters following the IT issues. The saga took another twist when it emerged some former TSB customers had found their direct debits had been cancelled and firms were apparently told that they had died.
And customers of the bank have faced further frustration just this week, with many unable to access their accounts on Monday.
Q: What indications have there been as to how TSB’s customers are feeling about the bank?
A: A recent survey from MoneySavingExpert.com saw TSB tumble down the website’s rankings in terms of customers’ satisfaction with their bank.
MoneySavingExpert.com said last week that TSB had plummeted from 4th to 11th place in its latest banking customer service survey, which the consumer help website carries out twice a year.
Some 49% of those who graded TSB said its service was poor and just 23% deemed it great.
Meanwhile, a separate survey carried out in July for GoCompare Money found 16% of TSB customers surveyed are considering switching banks.
Jonathan Reynolds MP, Labour’s Shadow Treasury Minister, has also welcomed Paul Pester’s exit, saying:
“TSB customers have suffered inexcusable levels of disruption and received service which has fallen far short of accepted standards. It is right that the most senior person at the bank has been held accountable for this.
“A decade on from the financial crisis, senior individuals taking responsibility in this way will be an essential building block of restoring public trust in our banking sector.”
Here’s Angela Monaghan’s news story on the shake-up at TSB (and its latest technology problems).
Does TSB know what year it is?
TSB have written to Treasury committee chair Nicky Morgan MP, confirming that Paul Pester has stepped down (three months after the committee said they’d lost confidence in him).
They may not have much confidence in Pester’s replacement either; executive chairman Richard Meddings apparently thinks it’s 2019!
Not a great look from a bank trying to shake off a reputation for IT problems.
I don’t imagine the right honourable member for Loughborough appreciates being hailed as “Morgan” either!
In reply, Nicky Morgan has welcomed Pester’s departure...and warned that that bank’s problems aren’t over.
The Committee remains concerned about the continuing problems at TSB, including unacceptable delays in compensating customers who have been badly let down. It is to be hoped that Dr Pester’s successor is able to restore the confidence of the bank’s long-suffering customers”.
Updated
South Africa’s lurch into recession is a blow to new prime minister Cyril Ramaphosa, who succeeded Jacob Zuma earlier this year:
Newsflash: South Africa has fallen into recession.
New figures show that the country’s GDP shrank by 0.7% in the second quarter of 2018 - news which is sending currency into a fresh dive.
Economists had expected growth of around 0.6%, after a sharp slump earlier this year. Instead, South Africa has now racked up two consecutive quarterly contractions - the classic definition of a recession.
The South African rand has promptly slumped by 2% against the US dollar, extending its earlier losses.
UK construction slows: what the experts say
Blane Perrotton, managing director of property consultancy and surveyors Naismiths, spies an “uneasy calm” in Britain’s building sector.
Here’s his take on drop in the UK construction PMI in August:
“Though levels of optimism have sagged, construction firms continue to hire, though this is likely to be driven by the need to get existing projects completed rather than a great bet on future demand.
“With Brexit storm clouds still looming on the horizon, the current modest progress is as much as can be expected – especially in the South East.
“Other markets are looking more buoyant – particularly the West Midlands and Bristol – but as the countdown to Brexit enters its final months, businesses’ gnawing sense of uncertainty will continue to peg back levels of investment. In that context, a steady ship should be seen as a real achievement.”
Financial analyst Emanuele Canegrati of BP Prime says the PMI is much weaker than expected.
But Max Jones of Lloyds Bank Commercial Banking is more optimistic:
“Recent results from contractors indicate some softness in civil engineering and sentiment here has not been helped by last week’s announcement that Crossrail project is behind schedule.
“Yet even if the UK’s current infrastructure pipeline may not be quite as bulging as some would hope, mega-projects like Heathrow, Hinkley Point and HS2 continue to offer quality work for firms right down the supply chain. Importantly, minds are focused on discipline, with anecdotal evidence that firms are holding prices during bidding negotiations.
“If the commercial market still looks fragile, much of this has to do with fears about the London market. Confidence in the capital remains intrinsically tied to Brexit, so any developments or certainty in negotiations will be warmly welcomed.”
UK building sector slowed last month
Growth in Britain’s construction sector has hit a three-month low in August, a new survey shows.
Housebuilding growth slipped to its weakest rate since March, according to data firm Markit. That won’t provide the new homes needed to tackle the UK housing shortage.
Civil engineering output was also disappointing, and actually fell in August, while commercial building work accelerated.
This pulled Markit’s construction PMI down to 52.9, much weaker than July’s 55.8. That’s not far from the 50-point mark showing stagnation.
It means builders could take breather after a busy few months, as Tim Moore, associate director at IHS Markit, explains:
“The construction sector slipped back into a slower growth phase in August, with this summer’s catch- up effect starting to unwind after projects were delayed by adverse weather at the start of 2018.
“Civil engineering was the worst performing area of the construction sector, with output in this category falling for the first time since March amid reports citing a lack of new work on infrastructure projects.
House building saw a particularly sharp slowdown since July, meaning that commercial construction was the fastest growing sub-sector in August.
Updated
The pound isn’t the only currency under pressure today.
Indeed, the US dollar is strengthening across the board, bringing more pain to emerging markets such as South Africa and Indonesia.
Carney uncertainty criticised
Several senior economists are unimpressed by the swirling uncertainty over Mark Carney’s future.
Professor Costas Milas of the University of Liverpool’s management school, argues that the governor should pledge to stay until 2021. That would be the typical eight-year term, rather than Carney’s planned six-year stint [ending in June 2019].
In a letter to the FT, professor Milas says this is the wrong time for a change of governor:
The rumour is that Mr Carney is considering a “Treasury request to serve another year as governor”. This will make it a seven-year service at the bank rather than the eight-year service advertised by the Treasury back in 2012.
Assuming that the rumour is a fact, the Treasury is indeed correct in asking Mr Carney to continue as governor at the bank. A critical, yet unwritten, rule of football is never substituting a player — let alone your (monetary policy) captain — when defending a corner.
Indeed, with Brexit headwinds remaining quite strong, this is not the time to replace the governor. That said, Mr Carney needs to commit to his full eight-year tenure. He is not a player on loan where he has the luxury to extend by one year and then by another one. As simple as that.
However, former Bank of England policymaker Andrew Sentance has criticised the “charade” around the governorship. He argues that the independence of the Bank is at risk:
In the City, the pound is dropping again as traders fret about Brexit....and the uncertainty at the Bank of England.
Sterling is down half a cent against the US dollar at $1.2825, having lost almost a cent on Monday.
Connor Campbell of SpreadEx explains:
Speculation over Mark Carney’s future at the Bank of England, and the continued opposition to Theresa May’s Chequers plan failed to help the pound recover Monday’s losses as Tuesday got underway.
The problem isn’t that Carney might stay on longer, but the fact he might not, his tenure as central bank chief set to end just after Britain officially leaves the EU. Combine this with the renewed attacks on May from Brexit hardliners and sterling couldn’t really do anything positive after the bell.
Despite the sometimes-shambolic state of TSB’s service since April, it appears that Paul Pester could still pick up a bonus.
Here’s the official line:
Paul will be paid in line with the bank’s remuneration policy and the terms of his contract.
The release of variable pay will take into account the outcome of performance conditions as well as ongoing regulatory and independent investigations.
Wes Streeting MP, another member of the Treasury committee, thinks Paul Pester’s departure hasn’t come fast enough .
Paul Pester quits: snap reaction
Alison McGovern MP reminds us that the Treasury committee asked TSB to consider Pester’s position three months ago.
Still, at least they got today’s announcement out....
Paul Pester’s departure comes five months after TSB suffered one of the worst IT crises in years, when a technology migration was botched, leaving thousands of customers unable to access their accounts.
Pester was roasted by MPs over his handling of the crisis; his future has been in doubt since June when the Treasury Committee said they had “lost confidence’ in him.
And the gremlins returned to TSB over the weekend, when ‘planned maintenance’ went wrong, leaving customers fuming.
Perhaps that was the last straw - either for Sabadell or Pester himself....
TSB CEO quits
Breaking: Paul Pester, the boss of TSB, has resigned - as the bank is struck by ANOTHER tech meltdown.
In a statement, the bank says:
The Board of TSB Bank Plc has today announced that after 7 years as CEO, Paul Pester will be stepping down from his position and leaving the company.
Richard Meddings, current Non Executive Chairman of TSB, will take on the role of Executive Chairman with immediate effect in order to enable a full public search to commence for a new CEO.
Whilst there is still work to do to achieve full stability for customers, TSB’s systems and services are much improved since the bank’s IT migration earlier this year. Paul and the Board have therefore agreed that this is the right time for Paul to step down and to appoint a new CEO for TSB.
More to follow....
Updated
Conservative MP George Freeman has also called on Mark Carney to stay longer at the Bank, saying:
“We need a Brexit that doesn’t damage business confidence, investment and jobs.
Mark Carney is the Alex Ferguson of the City - if he’ll do it he would be a smart pick.”
The problem, though, is that Carney may have had enough of playing on the hallowed turf of Threadneedle Street.
Plus, crucially, the rest of the Carney family are heading back to Canada this year (two of the governor’s daughters have A-levels and GCSEs this summer). Having already agreed to remain at the BoE another year (till summer 2019), would he really want to stay even longer?
The agenda: Mark Carney's future in question
Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of the world economy, the financial markets, the eurozone and business.
Mark Carney was described as the “the outstanding central banker of his generation” when he was dramatically appointed as Bank of England governor in 2012. Since then, he’s been called everything from the “high priest of Project Fear” to the “George Clooney of finance”
Now, with his stint at the Bank almost over, could the so-called “unreliable boyfriend” change his mind again?
There’s growing pressure on Carney to stick around longer at the Bank, rather than leave in June 2019 as planned. This would let him help the UK through the Brexit transition (or do I mean upheaval?), and calm the markets.
The rumour mill is working overtime, with the Treasury and the Bank of England apparently in discussions about Mark Carney staying on longer as governor.
Britain’s Treasury committee will try to get to the bottom of the situation today, when they question the governor about last month’s interest rate rise.
Some MPs are hoping that Carney could be persuaded to extend his stint in London longer, even though he’s planned to return to Canada for family reasons.
Stewart Hosie, a Scottish National Party MP on the committee, told us:
“It wouldn’t be a surprise at all if a member would ask [about Carney’s future].
Carney has done a very good job in what, in many cases, have been very difficult economic circumstances. There would be a lot of merit in the chancellor asking him to extend his term should that be the decision the chancellor were to take.
Brexit-loving MPs, though, won’t relish the thought of Mark Carney remaining (so to speak) at the Bank for longer, given his warnings about the cost of leaving the EU.
The agenda
- 9.30am BST: UK construction PMI for August
- 1.15pm BST: Treasury Committee hearing with BoE governor Mark Carney, chief economist Andy Haldane and MPC member Silvana Tenreyro