Wall Street traders have donned their “Dow 29,000” hats, to mark today’s rally.
Donald Trump will hope that trade war optimism, and the hint of tax cuts later this year, might see them wearing “Dow 30,000” before November.
But that is for another day. Until tomorrow, goodnight! GW
Record close on Wall Street
Boom! Wall Street has ended at a new all time closing high.
Relief that the Phase One trade deal with China is finally signed lifted stocks, despite the agreement’s flaw.
The Dow closed up 91 points, or 0.3%, at 29,031, having earlier hit an intraday peak at 29,127 points.
Trump: US-China relations are best ever
With the Phase One trade deal in the bag, Donald Trump is now hosting a lunch for the Chinese delegation and his own officials.
The president sound upbeat, saying that relations between the two sides are better than ever.
Full story: Trump boasts as trade deal finally signed
Here’s my colleague Dominic Rushe on today’s trade deal:
Donald Trump has signed the first phase of a new trade agreement with China after two years of tension between the two superpowers that have rattled economies around the world.
Trump said: “Today, we are taking a momentous step towards a future of fair and reciprocal trade. Together we are righting the wrong of the past.”
“At long last Americans have a government that puts them first at the negotiating table,” he said. “This is the biggest deal anybody has ever seen.”
Trump and China’s chief trade negotiator, Liu He, signed the deal at a packed press conference, attended by Ivanka Trump, much of Trump’s cabinet, Henry Kissinger, and media and business leaders including Stephen Schwarzman, the chairman of Blackstone, and Ajay Banga, the president of Mastercard. The signing came hours after Democrats named the team that will prosecute Trump in an impeachment trial that starts early next week.
The first phase of the deal will further open the Chinese market to US companies, and includes roughly $200bn in Chinese purchases of American goods and services. But it will also leave in place much of the $360bn worth of tariffs that the US has already imposed on Chinese goods, and the threat of additional punishment if Beijing does not live up to the terms of the deal.
Trump campaigned on tackling what he saw as China’s unfair trade practices, accusing the country of “raping” the US and perpetuating “the greatest theft in the history of the world”.
The often rancorous trade dispute has hurt agriculture, manufacturing and other sectors of the US economy, and the uncertainty it has engendered has worried business leaders. But its impact on the broader economy does not appear to have been as dire as some predicted.
The trade deal, if it holds, could be a major political boost for Trump in an election year when he can argue his tough stance with China has paid off. US stock markets hit new record highs ahead of the signing.
Anahita Thoms, Head of the Trade Practice at law firm Baker McKenzie in Germany, has also kicked the tires of the trade deal....and come away unimpressed.
She says that both sides will have concerns -- so we could see Phase Two, Three and Four trade deals in the years ahead.
Phase One, though, is not a major breakthrough:
“Ultimately, trade wars produce losers. The US has lost because of inevitably higher prices for consumers, whilst China has lost because overall the volume of its trade will fall. However, other countries such as Vietnam have benefitted in the short term by taking advantage of the changing trade opportunities, but in the long term, we will all lose because global growth is negatively impacted when the two biggest economies engage in a trade war for years.”
“For now, Phase One doesn’t strike a deal in a comprehensive way. In the beginning, the goal was about securing IP rights, easing the issues around forced technology transfer, market access and subsidies. In regards to Phase One, we are not there yet. Many, before President Trump, have tried to reach such a comprehensive deal, but it remains elusive for now.”
EIU: Deal is flawed
Nick Marro, analyst at The Economist Intelligence Unit, also has concerns about the deal.
He’s not convinced that China can meet its pledge of buying $200bn of extra goods from America each year. And even if it can, what happens in 2022 when the deal expires?
Marro fears that the trade war could flare up again, despite today’s upbeat (and sometimes rambling) signing ceremony. He says:
- The trade war has demonstrated the problems of overexposure to a single market. But rather than encouraging export diversification, the trade deal risks exacerbating this over reliance through its purchase targets.
- This is especially because much of these purchases will come via artificially generated demand, rather than market dynamics. Once the two year time frame is up, and China thinks about diversifying its imports, what might happen to US farmers who have since ramped up domestic production on expectations of Chinese demand? At face value, it’s not encouraging as a completely sustainable trade framework going forward.
- The deal has some encouraging language, but it’s provisions still leave open questions around the severe structural issues in the US-China trade relationship. This, combined with likely difficulties in implementing many of these commitments, suggests that there is a high risk that the deal might fall apart later this year. Companies may need to seriously consider the scenarios around a resumption in tariff hostilities.
Dr Kerstin Braun, President of Stenn Group, is also giving the phase one deal a muted reception.
She says America hasn’t made progress on key issues, including subsidies for Chinese companies that tilt the playing field unfairly.
“The US China phase one deal is long-awaited good news for global trade, which took a hit from the tariff war in 2019 to the tune of $420 billion in lost revenue for exporters.
“But while it’s a start, the deal fails to cover the significant issues that prompted the war in the first place. This includes China’s preferential support of state-owned enterprises and technology transfer from American companies doing business there.
“Both sides need to accept the larger picture. For the US, it’s that China as an economic power is not going away. For China, it’s that to be in the world marketplace means complying with international business standards.
“With a weakened World Trade Organisation and the general trend away from multilateral trade agreements, we’re only going to see more trade squabbles.
“China is already showing it can be less dependent on the US economy. China’s exports grew slightly last year overall, but exports to the US dropped 12.5%.”
Is today’s deal as momentous as Donald Trump claimed today?
No, according to Tim Drayson, Head of Economics at Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM). He says the deal doesn’t address key issues, will be hard for China to stick to, and still leaves trade barriers in place:
“The signing of the ‘Phase One’ trade deal marks the widely anticipated ceasefire in Trump’s trade war with China. While this could hold through to November, it probably marks the peak in improving news on the US and China relationship.
First, the majority of the existing tariffs remain in place, with no timetable for their removal. Second, it will be difficult for China to meet its target for purchases of US goods.
Third, the deal lacks a credible enforcement mechanism. Finally, progress on the key structural issues remain extremely limited.”
Details: China to buy $200bn more from US
Details of the trade deal are now being released by the White House.
It includes a pledge by China to buy another $200bn of US goods over the next two years, and will come into effect in 30 days.
However, China only appears to be promising to buy an extra $33bn of agricultural products (unless I’m missing something).
- Manufacturing goods: at least $32.9bn more in 2020, rising to $44.8bn more in 2021
- Agricultural products: at least $12.5bn more in 2020, rising to $19.5bn in 2021.
- Energy products: at least $18.5bn more in 2020, rising to $33.9bn in 2021
- Services: at least $12.8bn more in 2020, rising to $25.1 in 2021
China has also promised to restrict its requests for access to confidential data when reviewing whether to allow US companies to access its markets, and pledge to speed up the process for authorising US biotech products.
That will address some concerns about ‘forced technology transfers’, and the opening up of China’s markets.
Updated
Donald Trump signals to some of the audience to gather round to see the signing.
They don’t need asking twice, and soon the stage is packed.
The president is clearly keen to make this Phase One agreement seem like a very Big Deal.
But be clear, this is not a comprehensive deal to fully end the trade war. That’s why Trump hasn’t lowered tariffs on China’s goods today.
Updated
US-China Phase One trade deal signed.
Finally, after more than 18 months of trade conflict, America and China are signing the preliminary trade deal.
Donald Trump sets the scene in the White House, saying “The world is watching today, it’s a great honour to be here”.
Then he shakes hands with vice-premier Liu He, and the pair head over to the desks where a few copies of the agreement are waiting.
A few strokes of the pens later, and the deal is done!
Liu He is now issuing a serious warning to the US politicians and business leaders in the White House.
He says China and America must work closer together to tackle the world’s problems. Co-operation is the only right choice, he insists. We must work together, with mutual respect.
Reminder: earlier today the World Economic Forum warned that environmental dangers are now the top risks facing the global economy.
A trade war between Washington and Beijing undermines the global co-operation needed.
Simon Evenett,professor of economics at the University of St Gallen, smells a doll-sized rat....
Liu He now turns to his own remarks.
He insists that today’s deal is “mutually beneficial”, and complies with trade rules. We will honour it strictly, he promises.
Liu is hopeful that the Phase Two talks will go well, citing an old proverb that “a good beginning is the hardest part”.
He then says that China will import $40bn of US agricultural goods. If there’s strong demand, they can import more, he adds.
[Trump earlier cited a $50bn figure....]
Updated
Xi: We must work together
Trump is now inviting vice-premier Liu He to address the room (after joking that Liu deserves a break after all his hard work and should catch a movie).
Liu produces a letter from his boss, president Xi Jinping! It’s addressed to Donald Trump.
The letter begins with Xi telling Trump that conclusion of the phase one trade agreement between China and the US is good for both countries, and the whole world.
We need equality and mutual respect, to tackle issues together, says Xi. Both sides must implement the deal in “real earnestness”, and make progress in trade and economic co-operation. Healthy and steady growth in relations will need efforts from both sides.
Xi also says that he hopes that US treats Chinese companies fairly, and promises to work closely with Trump.
I believe that under our guidance, China-US relations will deliver more results and provide more benefits for our people
Xi concludes by wishing the Trump family best wishes, and happiness and success in the Chinese new year.
Trump: tariffs stay on! (for the moment)
Looking ahead, Donald Trump says the US and China will start talking about a Phase Two deal as this deal kicks in.
But in the meantime, the tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars of Chinese imports will remain in place.
We’re leaving tariffs on, but I will agree to take them off if we agree phase two, the president says. We need the tariffs, or we won’t have any cards to pay with, he adds.
And Trump concludes his remarks by claiming that “this is the biggest deal that anyone’s ever seen”.
It will bring “harmony, prosperity, commerce and much more between the US and China”, and “lead to even stronger world peace.”
Honestly....
Updated
Trump: Here's the deal
Trump has finally returned to the details of the US-China trade talks.
He says Beijing has agreed to “greatly expand” the products it buys from America, and will buy “much more than $200bn” over the next two years.
That includes more than $50bn on agriculture products, $75bn on manufacturing products, and $50bn of energy.
He says it also contains very strong IP protections, very strong restrictions on currency devaluations, and has “total and full enforceability”.
[But given the WTO is so weak, how will this deal really be enforced, I wonder...]
Trump reckons that China is now more open to US beef, pork, dairy, animal feed, and biotechnology.
I’m not saying the president is rambling (well, he is...) but Bloomberg TV has now switched away from the trade deal signing ceremony.
Viewers probably got the point, after thirty minutes of Trump patting his officials, and himself, on the back.
Trump now wants to know why investors will pay for other countries’ debt, but not Americas.
The president says this is unfair -- who is crazy enough to accept a guaranteed loss?
The reason... is that German debt (for example) is seen as a safe place to place your capital, so it’s worth paying over the face value of the bonds.
Also, the European Central Bank might buy those bonds off you for an even higher price, as part of its stimulus plan.
Some of America’s top business leaders are in the room, and President Trump is naming them in turn.
Most of them are doing incredibly well, Trump says, and it’s all thanks to him (I think this is a joke, but with this president you never know...)
He spots Boeing’s CEO David Calhoun, saying he has a big job turning the aircraft maker around after the 737 Max crisis.
Not your fault, David, says Trump generously. You’ll straighten it out quickly, I hope?
We will, pledges Calhoun, as Trump moves on...
...to the chief of eBay.
Trump isn’t happy that items he signs are turning up on the online auction site the next day, such as signed sneakers at $5,000. Sometimes it’s Senators and Congresspeople doing it, he puns.
Updated
OK, Trump’s veered waaaay away from the trade deal.
He’s now banging on about changing regulations so that a firework display can be held at Mount Rushmore.
At least he’s not talking about having his name chiseled into the rockface (yet...).
But it’s a really rambling performance:
Here’s a clip of Donald Trump’s opening comments on the trade deal, before he diverted into picking out allies in the audience and thanking them for their work.
Donald Trump is now name-checking various members of his administration, including Mike Pompeo, and thanking them for their work.
He takes a swipe at Congress, saying some of his audience may need to leave to vote in the “impeachment hoax”.
The president then picks out some friends in the audience, including Fox Business host Lou Dobbs, who Trump modestly says “always liked me, because he’s so smart”.
I’m really not sure what the Chinese delegation make of it all, but they’re standing politely and applauding occasionally while Trump hands out his verbal bouquets.
Updated
Trump turns to Robert Lighthizer, joking that his trade representative has been kept pretty busy in the last couple of years.
Was this deal easier or harder than you thought, Robert?, asks Trump innocently.
Harder, says Lighthizer ruefully.
Trump also gives his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, credit for helping on the trade deal (even though Lighthizer’s team appeared to do the heavy lifting).
And in a jovial mood, Trump jokes about how his advisor Larry Kudlow managed to talk the stock market up again after it suffered a rare $1trn selloff last year.
Vice-president Mike Pence takes the podium.
“This is a good day for America, China and the world,” says Pence, saying the deal helps to “put America first”.
Differences will remain between our two countries, but today’s deal signing marks a new, more productive relationship, Pence continues.
Actually, that’s a good point -- today’s signing ceremony is significant, if it means Washington and Beijing are on the path towards a full ceasefire in the trade war.
Trump: Momentous step forwards
The White House band is playing, as Donald Trump and Liu He arrive. Everyone’s on their feet.
The president speaks first.
Today, we are taking a momentous step towards a future of fair and reciprocal trade, says Trump. Together we are righting the wrong of the past.
He claims that the Phase One trade deal will provide economic security for US families, businesses and farmers.
And in a piece of classic Trump, the president says that many people thought such a deal was impossible (who exactly?!), but it should have happened a long time ago.
Trump speaks warmly of Liu He being a friend, and says he will visit China in the ‘not too distant future’.
The room is now packed. And at the front, there are two desks, each bearing several documents - presumably ready to be signed by Trump and Liu.
Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner have just arrived in the East Room, ready for the deal signing.
We’re expecting Donald Trump to sign it for the US, with vice-premier Liu He representing China.
Seats are filling up fast in the East Room of the White House, ready for the signing ceremony for the phase one trade deal.
The Nasdaq index of tech stocks has also hit a new all-time high, over 9,298 points.
The signing of the US-China trade deal is due to take place in around 10 minutes.
But despite the White House’s best efforts, it’s not the biggest story in Washington today.
This is:
Wall Street’s ‘fear index’ has dropped to its lowest level of the year:
Dow hits record high
Boom! The Dow Jones industrial average has hit a new all-time high.
These optimistic noises from Larry Kudlow and Stephen Mnuchin may be cheering New York traders, encouraging them to drive stocks higher.
This has lifted the Dow by 0.5%, or 150 points, to 29,089 -- a new peak.
A former White House cabinet secretary, Chris Lu, has warned that American consumers are paying the price for Donald Trump’s trade wars.
Lu, who served under Barack Obama, points out that the tariffs imposed on Chinese goods arriving at US ports are a burden on consumers (as the importer pays them).
China hopes some tariffs are scrapped soon
China is hoping that the White House might roll back some tariffs in the coming months, if the Phase One trade deal holds up.
That’s according to the Global Times, a Chinese newspaper which is a good guide to Beijing’s thinking.
China and the US are set to sign the long-awaited phase one trade deal on Wednesday (US time); the deal, which involves a nine-chapter text, has fully taken into account the concerns and interests of both countries, and it is expected to bring the world’s two largest economies back on track to stable and sound development, experts close to the deal told the Global Times on Wednesday.
The hard-won text involves nine chapters, touching sectors such as intellectual property rights (IPR), technology transfer, food and agricultural products, financial services, exchange rates and transparency, trade expansion as well as bilateral assessments and dispute settlement mechanisms.
“The phase one deal, which is signed based on an equal footing, is in the interests of both countries and will be a constraining force on both China and the US,” Gao Lingyun, an expert at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing who is close to the trade talks, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
As the two reached consensus on the phase-one deal, US agreed to lower tariffs on $120 billion worth of Chinese products to 7.5 percent from 15 percent, but a 25 percent tariff remains on roughly $250 billion worth of Chinese products. The US also rolled back plans to impose tariffs on all additional imports.
“The tariffs will be further scrapped when negotiations in the upcoming months run smoothly,” Gao said.
Larry Kudlow is now talking up the US-China trade deal, saying it will be good for the American economy, and the wider global economy.
Nothing like this has ever happened before. I don’t care what side of the aisle you’re on, this is a fantastic deal.
But he also confirms that issues such as the subsidies paid to Chinese firms, and technology licensing are not covered in today’s deal.
Q: But are there any plans to lower tariffs on Chinese tariffs?
If the agreements in this deal are adhered to, it will make Phase Two much easier, Kudlow replies.
In other words, if America decides China isn’t abiding by its pledges, tariffs won’t be cut.
So much for worrying about the deficit!
National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow, a top economic adviser to President Trump, has revealed that the White House plans to unveil a plan for additional tax cuts later in 2020.
Speaking to CNBC, Kudlow revealed the move would come in the summer -- when the presidential election campaign would be intensifying
“I am still running a process of Tax Cuts 2.0. We’re many months away – it’ll come out something later during the campaign.
Tax Cuts 2.0 to help middle-class economic growth: That’s still our goal.”
Kudlow added:
“I had a tremendous meeting with my friend Kevin Brady, who will undoubtedly be the new chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.
But we will unveil this perhaps sometimes later in the summer.”
Thee excitement around the US-China phase-one trade deal has already faded in markets, even before the ink is wet on the paper.
So says Silvia Dall’Angelo, Senior Economist at Hermes Investment Management.
The deal is now expected to bear only limited fruit: US officials suggested overnight that in the absence of a phase-two agreement, the US is unlikely to roll back further tariffs against China before the Presidential elections later this year. That is hardly surprising.
The deal seemed already fragile when it was announced in mid-December: details were scant (a full document will be provided only after the signing), some of the commitments (such as the $200bn step-up in Chinese purchases of US goods and services in the next two years) seemed unrealistic, and there was extreme vagueness concerning some crucial aspects such as intellectual property protections and technological transfers.
All in all, trade tensions between the US and China might well re-surface over the course of the year, also depending on how US domestic electoral dynamics pan out in coming months.”
Wall Street has opened calmly, as investors await today’s Phase One trade deal signing.
The Dow has gained 60 points, or 0.2%, up to 28,999 points --- tantalising close to the 29k level hit for the first time last week.
Mnuchin also told reporters that the White House is “indifferent” to whether the tariffs on US-China trade are reduced before, or after, November’s election.
I’m not sure that America farmers share this relaxed approach, given the drop in soybean sales.
US firms who have to either absorb tariffs on Chinese imports or pass then onto consumers are also keen to see progress.
Treasury secretary Mnuchin has also been challenged over the US deficit, which has jumped by over 11% according to new figures.
Is it safe to be borrowing so much, and does this show that Donald Trump’s tax cuts aren’t working?
Mnuchin (ever loyal), insists that the Trump tax cuts will pay for themselves over the next decade.
He blames spending commitments, rather than taxes, for the yawning deficit.
There’s no question that over time, we need to look at government spending issues.
That’s the cause of the deficit, not tax cuts.
That’s likely to alarm those who fear cuts to social security and Medicare. Military spending has also gone up sharply, and could rise further if geopolitical tensions increase.
It’s fair to say that global investors don’t quite share Stephen Mnuchin’s excitement about today’s trade deal ceremony.
There’s plenty of disappointment that the White House isn’t cutting some of the tariffs imposed on Chinese imports since the trade war began in 2018 (one CIO dubbed these tariffs a ‘roach motel’ overnight)
Investors have also noted that the big issues, such as intellectual property protection and subsidies, have been deferred until a future Phase Two deal
Hugh Grieves, fund manager at Premier Miton, says the Phase One agreement doesn’t end the war:
“The phase 1 trade deal due to be signed later today will allow both Presidents Trump and Xi to claim a political victory after a bruising two-year trade war. When the details of the agreement are released however, we will be shown just how much, or (more likely) how little, structural reform China has committed to in return for just $200bn of increased imports (equal to only approximately half of China’s 2018 bilateral trade deficit) and some tariff reduction.
“But whatever the details in this limited agreement, it does not resolve the underlying tensions, both political and economic, between the two countries and therefore investors should expect further tensions to be a feature of the future investing landscape.”
US: China trade deal is a great win
Newsflash: The Phase-One trade deal that America and China will sign today is an “enormous win”.
That’s according to Treasury secretary Stephen Mnuchin, who is speaking outside the White House now.
Mnuchin insists that this preliminary deal is a great success, even though it doesn’t appear to cover important issues such as cyber crime.
This is the first time that we’ve had an agreement with China that addresses agricultural purchases, structural reforms, financial services and currency issues, says Mnuchin.
He adds that China has also agreed to buy “$200bn of additional things” over the next few years.
Sweeping aside fears that the deal is a damp squib, he says the White House expects “significant growth” this year.
This is an enormous win.
The average consumer will see a stronger economy in 2020 thanks to this deal....
The deal itself should be signed in a few hours time (11.30am in Washington, or 4.30pm UK time).
BA cries foul over Flybe rescue
Just in: British Airways’ owner IAG has filed an official complaint to the European Commission over the rescue of Flybe.
The move comes amid a growing backlash to the government’s rescue of the ailing regional carrier from rival airlines, opposition politicians, and environmentalists.
My colleague Gwyn Topham explains:
IAG has written to the competition directorate of the EU saying that the rescue deal announced on Tuesday night by ministers, which could include a £100m loan and deferral of an outstanding tax bill, contravenes state aid rules.
IAG’s chief executive, Willie Walsh, had earlier described the deal as “a blatant misuse of public funds”.
The European Commission said it was ready to discuss with Britain its rescue of regional airline Flybe, noting that any state aid should be designed to avoid the distortion of competition and a level playing field.
Here’s the full story:
Tackling the climate emergency will need some tough decisions.
The UK government faces one in the North of England, where a new £165m coalmine in Cumbria is being planned.
But a new report, from Lancaster University professors Rebecca Willis and Mike Berners-Lee, shows that the mine would undercut the UK’s goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2050.
They’ve calculated that the mine would produce 8.4m tonnes of CO2 per year, equivalent to the emissions from more than 1 million households.
Here’s the full story:
Full story: Climate crisis looms over Davos
Our economics editor Larry Elliott is back from WEF’s press conference on its Global Risks report, and says:
A year of extreme weather events and mounting evidence of global heating have catapulted the climate emergency to the top of the list of issues worrying the world’s elite.
The World Economic Forum’s annual risks report found that, for the first time in its 15-year history, the environment filled the top five places in the list of concerns likely to have a major impact over the next decade.
Børge Brende, President of the World Economic Forum, said: “The political landscape is polarised, sea levels are rising and climate fires are burning. This is the year when world leaders must work with all sectors of society to repair and reinvigorate our systems of cooperation, not just for short-term benefit but for tackling our deep-rooted risks.”
After a month that has seen bush fires raging out of control in Australia, Brende said there was a need for urgent action.
“We have only a very small window and if we don’t use that window in the next 10 years we will be moving around the deckchairs on the Titanic.”...
More here:
WEF have tweeted about their Risks Report (which is online here).
Top decision makers under the age of 40 have particularly strong concerns about climate, today’s WEF Risks Report has found.
It says:
The report highlights how risks are seen by those born after 1980. They ranked environmental risks higher than other respondents, in the short- and long- terms.
Almost 90% of these respondents believe “extreme heat waves”, “destruction of ecosystems” and “health impacted by pollution” will be aggravated in 2020; compared to 77%, 76% and 67% respectively for other generations. They also believe that the impact from environmental risks by 2030 will be more catastrophic and more likely.
So is there any hope?
Emily Farnworth, head of climate change at WEF, argues that there is. The Paris Agreement of 2015 sent businesses a clear signal that governments want slow their emissions.
She’s also optimistic that social and technology entrepreneurs, springing up around the world, can deliver the “exponential change” needed if the 2020s are to be a “decade of delivery”.
We know what the challenge is, we need to get on and address it.
The key risks for 2020
WEF’s Risks Report has also predicted that 2020 will see rising political and social tensions, both within countries and between them.
So with the added risk of economic slowdown, it could be a turbulent year.
78% of survey respondents said they expect “economic confrontations” and “domestic political polarization” to rise in 2020.
Increased political polarisation, extreme heat waves and the destruction of the natural environment are also worryingly likely, with policymakers struggling to make the progress needed on the climate emergency.
Here are the six key points from the report (online here).
Geopolitical Instability:
National politics in many countries has evidenced intense divisiveness and ‘pushbacks’, coupled with increasingly fractious international relations. These volatilities will likely persist, challenging cooperation on key priorities.
Economic Concerns:
As economic confrontations between major powers grow, the global economy shows greater signs of a concerted slowdown.
Climate Response Shortcomings:
Weak international agreements belie rising investor and popular pressure for action, against a backdrop of a multitude of natural catastrophes and indicators of longer-term disruptions. 2020 is a critical year for nations to accelerate progress towards major emissions reductions and boosting adaption investments.
Biodiversity Loss Impacts:
Many ecosystems are in decline or at risk of distinction. Biodiversity loss poses irreversible consequences to societies, economies, and the health of the planet.
Technological Governance Deficits:
Emerging technology risks can erode social discourse, threaten economic stability, exacerbate geostrategic competition, and pressure national and international security. Getting a better handle on systemic risks will require a significant technology governance refresh at all levels.
Creaking Health Systems:
Changing societal, environmental, demographic, and technological trends are straining health systems globally. While transformative technology, medicines, and insurance can improve healthcare, they also introduce new risks and trade-offs.
Britain’s weak inflation is likely to spur the Bank of England to cut interest rates this month, says Garry Young of economic thinktank NIESR.
But he’s not convinced they should....
The surprise fall in UK inflation to 1.3% has knocked the pound back below $1.30.
Traders are (understandably) concluding that an interest rate cut is more likely.
Significantly, core inflation has dropped to just 1.4%, from 1.7% in November -- showing price pressures are weakening.
Guy Foster, head of research at wealth manager Brewin Dolphin, says:
The Bank of England has been studiously steering interest rate expectations lower, but this morning’s collapse in core inflation further increased the likelihood that rates will be cut to 0.5% when the MPC meets on 30th January.
Core inflation is now back at the levels last seen in 2016.”
Shops slashed women’s clothing prices particularly sharply last month, the Office for National Statistics says:
The largest individual downward contributions came from women’s casual jackets and cardigans, where prices fell between November and December 2019 but rose between the same two months in 2018.
There were also small individual downward contributions from formal trousers and formal skirts.
There is evidence of increased discounting, with the proportion of women’s clothing items recorded on sale being higher in December 2019 than in December 2018.
UK inflation rate hits three-year low
Britain’s inflation rate has fallen to a three-year low, making an early interest rate cut increasingly likely.
The Consumer Prices Index fell to just 1.3% in December, down from 1.5% in November, to its lowest since November 2016. That’s some way below the Bank of England’s target of 2%.
Clothing and restaurants had the biggest downward push on prices. That suggests that retailers have been forced to slash prices to encourage customers through their doors.
Q: Is China engaging enough on these issues?
Brende replies that it is crucial that China is a part of the global fight against climate.
He points out that they have lead a major role in solar and wind power, helping to drive prices down.
China has been a “responsible player in sticking to multilateral agreements”....”We cannot succeed... without China on board”, Brende says.
Q: Is WEF concerned about the new, pneumonia-like virus spreading in China?
The world is not ready for another pandemic, Brende replies sternly.
Børge Brende, president of the World Economic Forum, warns that policymakers only have 10 years to address the climate emergency - otherwise they’ll just be “moving deckchairs on the Titanic”.
But he’s also optimistic, pointing out that the cost of solar energy is 10 times as cheap as a decade ago. A lot can happen in 10 years, if people react.
Global Risks report: The key charts
Here are some key charts from WEF’s risks report, showing how environmental issues (coloured green) are now seen as the biggest threat to the global economy.
WEF: Davos will be carbon neutral this year
WEF are now taking questions.... firstly from my colleague Larry Elliott.
Q: Next week, lots of the CEOs who say they want to fight the climate emergency will be flying to Davos in their private jets - isn’t there a major reality gap here?
Most people who go to Davos go by rail, WEF’s Adrian Monck replies [Larry and I will be chugging up the mountain next week]
There’s biofuel at Zurich Airport if you want to top up your private jet, and the Annual Meeting is going to be carbon neutral, Monck adds.
But he agrees that Davos needs to do more than just pay lip service to environmental issues.
There’s nothing worse than an organisation recognising a risk and doing nothing about it, which is why we take it so seriously.
Biodiversity loss and a warming planet are linked, Giger adds -- one can lead to the other.
Businesses, consumers and regulators....need to prioritise investments that protect the planet.
Peter Giger, Zurich’s group chief risk officer, says the loss of biodiversity is a very serious risk to the global economy.
We rely on biodiversity, from pollinating crops to curing diseases.
Updated
John Drzik, chairman of financial service firm Marsh & McLennan Insights, is now speaking at the Global Risks report press conference.
He says there is mounting pressure on the public sector to act on environmental risks, in the face of rising threats.
The situation is “bad and getting worse”, Drzik says. Climate impact was very visible in 2019, he says, citing wildfires in Australia, Europe and California, and flooding in other regions.
The business community need to focus with more intensity on the risks from climate emergency, but also the opportunities, Drzik continues.
Drzik says investors and regulators are taking the issue more seriously, so bosses need to do the same. He cited BlackRock’s decision yesterday to focus on sustainable investment, following heavy criticism for its investment in fossil fuels.
Updated
The World Economic Forum is outlining its Risks Report at a press conference in London now.
The first chapter is called “An Unsettled World” - focusing on the current fractured global situation. This is making it harder to tackle issues such as the climate emergency.
WEF’s Mirek Dusek explains:
It is the super-risk. All the other risks that we need to contend with, there is this drag that we have to contend with - that we live in a more polarised, more competitive world.
The Risks Report also focuses on environmental issues -- such as the threat of accelerated biodiversity loss.
A conservative estimate says we are losing 200 to 2,000 species per year -- this is an issue of critical importance.
Updated
Environmental risks are top threats to global economy
NEWSFLASH: the World Economic Forum’s new global risks report is out!
And for first time in its 15 year history, the top five global risks to the global economy over the next decade are all related to the environment.
This confirms that the climate emergency has rocketed to the top of the global agenda, with business leaders and economists now awake to the dangers from rising temperatures.
The top five are:
- Extreme weather events
- Failure of climate change mitigation and adaptation
- Human made environmental damage and disaster
- Major biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse
- Major natural disasters such as earthquakes.
This comes from a survey of 759 global experts and decision makers across the globe, many of whom will be travelling to Davos next week for WEF’s Annual Meeting.
WEF are announcing more details from the report now....
Updated
Michael Saunders has also produced this chart, showing why he believes UK interest rates should be cut:
Bank of England policymaker repeats call for rate cuts
Newsflash: Bank of England policymaker Michael Saunders has warned that the UK economy appears to be stagnating.
Speaking in Northern Ireland right now, Saunders says that is recent business surveys suggest there is ‘little or no growth’ in the British economy right now.
So with growth sluggish, Saunders favours an “expansionary monetary policy stance” -- ie lower interest rates.
In a speech titled Risk management in a sluggish economy, he says:
“It probably will be appropriate to maintain an expansionary monetary policy stance and possibly to cut rates further, in order to reduce risks of a sustained undershoot of the 2% inflation target.
With limited monetary policy space, risk management considerations favour a relatively prompt and aggressive response to downside risks at present.”
Saunders is one of two policymakers who voted to cut interest rates at the Bank’s last meeting in December. Other members of the Monetary Policy Committee have sounded dovish since, meaning rates could be lowered at the next meeting in a fortnight.
Howard Archer of EY Item Club reckons Saunders is certain to vote for a cut again.
Unusually, the full text of the Phase One trade deal hasn’t been released yet.
But Reuters has heard some details:
China has pledged to buy almost $80 billion of additional manufactured goods from the United States over the next two years as part of a trade war truce, according to a source, though some U.S. trade experts call it an unrealistic target.
Under the Phase 1 trade deal to be signed on Wednesday in Washington, China would also buy over $50 billion more in energy supplies and boost purchases of U.S. services by about $35 billion over the same period, the source, who was briefed on the deal, told Reuters late on Monday.
The agreement also calls for Chinese purchases of U.S. agricultural goods to increase by some $32 billion over two years, or roughly $16 billion a year, said the source.
Investor: China tariffs are a 'roach motel'
Donald Trump famously claimed that trade wars were good and easy to win.
But Washington’s refusal to dial back the tariffs on $360bn Chinese goods shows clearly that trade wars are hard to get out of.
Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer of Bleakley Advisory Group, says US businesses need to hunker down, as they can’t escape these tariffs easily.
We’re still stuck with these tariffs which are a drag on growth in trade and manufacturing
These tariffs have now become a roach motel.”
(for those unversed in Americanisms, this means a place you can easily get into, but struggle to escape)
Updated
Asia-Pacific stocks have been hit by America’s refusal to lift tariffs on Chinese goods.
Almost all the major indices are in the red, as traders face up to the prospect of more trade tensions this year.
China’s CSI300 index is down 0.5%, with India’s Sensex losing 0.6%.
Introduction: Phase One deal due today, but...
Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of the world economy, the financial markets, the eurozone and business.
The US and China will finally sign their Phase One trade deal today, but there’s no much celebration in the markets.
President Donald Trump and vice-premier Liu He will both put their signatures to the agreement, at a ceremony in Washington later today. The deal should calm the turbulent trade conflict between the two nations which blew up in 2018, slowing global trade and hurting the world economy.
We can expect Trump to talk up the deal as a major breakthrough, with Beijing agreeing to buy up to $50bn of US agricultural products per year.
But the fizz is going flat, even before the corks fly out of the bottles.
That’s because the White House has already declared that the existing tariffs imposed over the last 18 months or so will remain in place until a full trade deal deal is agreed.
That means tariffs on $360bn of Chinese imports will remain in place, probably until after November’s presidential election.
Treasury secretary Stephen Mnuchin broke the news to reporters overnight, saying:
“These tariffs will stay in place until there is a Phase 2. If the president gets a Phase 2 in place quickly, he’ll consider releasing tariffs as part of Phase 2.”
We don’t know exactly what’s in the 80-page Phase One deal, but it appears to duck some of the really serious sticking points, such as intellectual property protections and China’s subsidies of its companies.
Investors fear that a comprehensive trade deal could take a long time to agree, given the long grind just to agree Phase One.
There’s also concern that China might not stick to the deal, meaning it could swiftly unravel:
As Ipek Ozkardeskaya, senior analyst at Swissquote Bank, puts it:
The US – China trade deal is like watching a live show in the theatre of the absurd. The Trump administration revealed a detail that nobody expected just before the signature of the phase-one trade deal today: the tariff cuts will not take effect before the US election in November.
This means that the US tariffs will continue weighing on Chinese exports for almost an additional year, while the emerging market giant will certainly be asked to deliver on its promise to buy massive amounts of US farm goods and manufactured products immediately. The risk here is that the double-standard agreement could provide a weak basis for the future negotiations, impair the benefits, or even spoil the deal.
So don’t bank on major action in the markets today, although the Dow Jones industrial average did briefly jump over 29,000 points yesterday, before tariff fears struck....
Also coming up today
The World Economic Forum are releasing their annual Global Risks report, identifying the key threats to the global economy ahead of next week’s gathering in Davos. Trade wars, the climate emergency and geopolitical tensions will probably feature highly.
We also get the latest UK inflation data - a weak reading could give the Bank of England more leeway to consider an interest rate cut.
The agenda
- 9am GMT: World Economic Forum publishes its Global Risks report
- 9.30am GMT: UK inflation data for December. Expected to remain at 1.5%, a three-year low
- 4.30pm GMT: US and China sign their Phase One trade deal