Mark Sweney 

Cleared UK tech tycoon feared he would die in US jail if convicted

Mike Lynch uses first interview since acquittal in June of fraud charges to call for overhaul of extradition law
  
  

Mike Lynch arrives at federal court in San Francisco, California, US, on 18 March 2024
Mike Lynch says: ‘It has to be wrong that a US prosecutor has more power over a British citizen living in England than the UK police do.’ Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images

The British tech tycoon Mike Lynch has said he thought he would die in a US jail if he had not been cleared of defrauding Hewlett-Packard over a multibillion-dollar business deal.

In his first interview since his acquittal last month on charges related to the $11.1bn (£8.6bn) purchase of his company Autonomy in 2011, the man once lauded as the UK’s answer to Bill Gates said that his lung condition meant he doubted he would have survived a prison term.

He had been accused of duping the US technology company into overpaying for the software firm he founded. HP subsequently took an $8.8bn writedown of Autonomy’s entire value 15 months after the deal was first disclosed, alleging it had discovered “serious accounting improprieties” and blaming Lynch for perpetrating a $5bn fraud, an accusation he denied.

The 59-year-old billionaire was cleared by a Californian court on 6 June of all 15 counts of fraud, which meant he avoided facing up to 25 years in a US prison.

“I have various medical things that would have made it very difficult to survive, Lynch told the Sunday Times. “If this had gone the wrong way, it would have been the end of life as I have known it in any sense.”

Lynch, who said he “never watched anything with prisons in it” during the 13 months he spent under house arrest in San Francisco after his extradition in May last year, said he was keen to fund a British equivalent of the Innocence Project, a US nonprofit that works to gain the release of people it believes have been wrongfully convicted.

“The system can sweep individuals away,” he said. “There needs to be a contrarian possibility that’s saying: ‘Right, well, the whole world thinks you’re guilty but, actually, was that a fair conviction?’”

Lynch, a science adviser to David Cameron when he was prime minister and a former non-executive director of the BBC who received an OBE for services to enterprise in 2006, spent two years fighting extradition to the US to face trial.

Another item on his to-do list is to seek to address the imbalance he believes there is in the extradition treaty between the UK and the US. “It has to be wrong that a US prosecutor has more power over a British citizen living in England than the UK police do,” he said.

HP was the world’s maker of personal computers when it bought Autonomy as part of a move into software. Lynch departed as Autonomy’s CEO less than a year after the takeover, as according to HP his firm had failed to meet expectations.

After the writedown, HP said a senior Autonomy executive had come forward with concerns that it said had been substantiated by an investigation and referred the findings to regulators.

In November 2018, a federal grand jury indicted Lynch and Stephen Chamberlain, Autonomy’s former vice-president of finance. The pair were accused of scheming to defraud Autonomy investors, including HP, about its true performance, financial condition and growth prospects. Both pleaded not guilty.

After being extradited to the US in May last year, Lynch was ordered by a court to pay a $100m bond and put under 24-hour armed guard, deemed to be a flight risk. He and Chamberlain were cleared last month.

However, Lynch’s battle with HP continues in the UK. In 2022, HP won a six-year civil fraud case against Lynch after a high court judge ruled that he had defrauded HP by manipulating Autonomy’s accounts to inflate the value of the company.

Mr Justice Hildyard, the high court judge in the case, is expected to rule on HP’s claim for $4bn in damages. The judge has said the level of damages he intends to award will be much lower.

Lynch, who said that his finances were not in a “perilous situation” because of successful tech investments made by his wife on his advice, intends to appeal the ruling.

 

Leave a Comment

Required fields are marked *

*

*